From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 18, 1961
273 Ala. 5 (Ala. 1961)

Opinion

8 Div. 63.

April 6, 1961. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1961.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Colbert County, C. K. Delony, J.

Howell T. Heflin, Tuscumbia, for petitioner.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.


In its opinion, the Court of Appeals states that "A motion for a new trial rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and its action will not be disturbed on appeal except where abuse of discretion is clearly shown." When considered in its context, it is apparent that the Court of Appeals was considering a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The authorities cited by the Court of Appeals support the statement of the Court of Appeals when so considered. We add that the same statement appears in Nichols v. State, 267 Ala. 217, 100 So.2d 750. In that case, as here, the reference is to newly discovered evidence and should be so restricted.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Page v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 18, 1961
273 Ala. 5 (Ala. 1961)
Case details for

Page v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tracy PAGE v. STATE of Alabama

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 18, 1961

Citations

273 Ala. 5 (Ala. 1961)
130 So. 2d 227

Citing Cases

Page v. State

A motion for new trial on ground of newly discovered evidence rests in sound discretion of trial court, and…

Zuck v. State

Cork v. State, 50 Ala. App. 670, 282 So.2d 107. The granting or denial of a new trial on the basis of newly…