From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 27, 2015
Case No. CV 13-1167-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-1167-JVS (JEM)

04-27-2015

RICHARD LAWRENCE PAGE, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: April 27, 2015

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Page v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 27, 2015
Case No. CV 13-1167-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Page v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LAWRENCE PAGE, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 27, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-1167-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

Eubanks v. Espinoza

Respondent also points out that "[d]istrict courts have allowed section 987.9 materials to be lodged under…