From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 19, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover damages for injuries sustained when he fell from a scaffold while performing work on a construction project in Massachusetts.

Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's causes of action alleging violations of sections 200, 240 (1) and 241 (6) of the New York State Labor Law and various rules and regulations thereunder. "The New York Legislature is without authority to impose standards of conduct on contractors, owners and agents relating to a worksite located in a foreign jurisdiction" (Brewster v Baltimore Ohio R.R. Co., 167 A.D.2d 908; see also, Bardin v Tuozzolo, 190 A.D.2d 1090, lv dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 705).


Summaries of

Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corporation

Case Details

Full title:RODGER A. PADULA, Appellant, v. LILARN PROPERTIES CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

Huston v. Hayden Bldg. Corp.

We further find that Labor Law § 241 (6) (which was not an issue in Salsman) directs owners, contractors and…