From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court of City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Dec 16, 1929
102 Cal.App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)

Opinion

Docket No. 6841.

December 16, 1929.

PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review a summary judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles. Raymond I. Turney, Judge. Judgment affirmed.

Holbrook, Taylor Tarr for Petitioner.

Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and F.W. Fellows and Joe W. Matherly, Deputies City Prosecutor, for Respondent.


On writ of review of a summary judgment entered upon forfeiture of a bail bond. [1] The grounds upon which petitioner claims that the judgment should be annulled are included in the questions which have been discussed in our Civil No. 6799, Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court et al., ante, p. 566 [ 283 P. 345], in which the decision has been this day filed. We think that the respondent court acted within, and not in excess of, its jurisdiction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court of City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Dec 16, 1929
102 Cal.App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
Case details for

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court of City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Dec 16, 1929

Citations

102 Cal.App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
283 P. 347

Citing Cases

People v. Ross

' "The following cases do hold that a municipal court may order bail forfeited where defendant fails to…