stating that "[t]he judicial process grinds exceedingly fine as to questions of law. * * * A principle reason for selecting arbitration is that the costs of using [these] exceedingly fine wheels are thought not worth the additional assurance afforded by the judicial process"
Summary of this case from Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel Casino, Inc.Opinions on pages 164-542 omitted.
REVIEWS GRANTED
stating that "[t]he judicial process grinds exceedingly fine as to questions of law. * * * A principle reason for selecting arbitration is that the costs of using [these] exceedingly fine wheels are thought not worth the additional assurance afforded by the judicial process"
Summary of this case from Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel Casino, Inc.Full title:PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of Sutter…
Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District
Date published: Jan 29, 1991
Instead, only "utterly irrational" legal conclusions will be cognizable; "[i]n these circumstances the…