From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacheco v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 5, 1975
529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975)

Summary

In Pacheco v. State, 529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex.Cr.App. 1975), this Court approved an aggravated assault indictment that alleged in pertinent part that the accused "did then and there use a pistol, a deadly weapon, to intentionally threaten imminent bodily injury to Ernest Riojas."

Summary of this case from Bell v. State

Opinion

No. 50933.

November 5, 1975.

Appeal from the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, John G. Benavides, J.

Antonio G. Cantu, San Antonio, on appeal only, for appellant.

Ted Butler, Dist. Atty., Michael Schill and Susan D. Reed, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Punishment was assessed at ten years.

Appellant waived his right to demand prosecution upon indictment and proceeded to trial upon information. Art. 1.141, V.A.C.C.P. In his only ground of error appellant challenges the sufficiency of the information to charge an offense. In material part the information alleges that appellant:

'Did then and there use a pistol, a deadly weapon, to intentionally threaten imminent bodily injury to Ernest Riojas. . . .'

We perceive no material difference between alleging that one intentionally threatened another with imminent bodily injury by using a pistol and alleging that one used a pistol to intentionally threaten another with imminent bodily injury. Each is sufficient to allege aggravated assault with a deadly weapon under V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sections 22.01(a)(2) and 22.02(a)(3). The ground of error is overruled.

V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 22.01(a)(2), provides:

"(a) A person commits an offense if he:

"(2) intentionally or knowingly threatens another with imminent bodily injury; or . . .'

V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 22.02(a)(3), provides:
'(a) A person commits an offense if he commits assault as defined in Section 22.01 of this code and he:

'(3) uses a deadly weapon. . . .'

The judgment is affirmed.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Pacheco v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 5, 1975
529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975)

In Pacheco v. State, 529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex.Cr.App. 1975), this Court approved an aggravated assault indictment that alleged in pertinent part that the accused "did then and there use a pistol, a deadly weapon, to intentionally threaten imminent bodily injury to Ernest Riojas."

Summary of this case from Bell v. State

In Pacheco v. State, 529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex.Crim.App. 1975) the instrument charging aggravated assault with a deadly weapon alleged that the defendant "... did then and there use a pistol, a deadly weapon, to intentionally threaten imminent bodily injury to Ernest Riojas."

Summary of this case from Pass v. State

In Pacheco v. State, 529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex.Cr.App. 1975), the Court of Criminal Appeals stated about a similar indictment, "We perceive no material difference between alleging that one intentionally threatened another with imminent bodily injury by using a pistol and alleging that one used a pistol to intentionally threaten another with imminent bodily injury. Each is sufficient to allege aggravated assault with a deadly weapon under Tex.Penal Code Ann. §§ 22.01(a)(2) and 22.02(a)(3) (Vernon 1974)."

Summary of this case from Mills v. State
Case details for

Pacheco v. State

Case Details

Full title:Santiago G. PACHECO, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 5, 1975

Citations

529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Pass v. State

However, our problem is not one of preference but rather of compliance, and so we must decide whether the…

Mills v. State

See Moore v. State, 473 S.W.2d 523 (Tex.Cr.App. 1971). In Pacheco v. State, 529 S.W.2d 77 (Tex.Cr.App. 1975),…