Opinion
[No. 56, October Term, 1935.]
Decided January 15th, 1936.
Criminal Law — Motion in Arrest — Appeal
A motion in arrest of judgment must be for errors apparent on the face of the proceedings, and, if based on an alleged error in findings of fact, it is merely a motion for a new trial, the decision on which is not the subject of appeal.
Decided January 15th, 1936.
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City (DENNIS, C.J.).
Criminal proceeding against Alarz Ozinec. From a judgment of conviction, he appeals. Affirmed.
The cause was submitted on briefs to BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, PARKE, SLOAN, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.
Richard E. Preece, for the appellant.
Herbert R. O'Conor, Attorney General, Hilary W. Gans, Deputy Attorney General, J. Bernard Wells, State's Attorney for Baltimore City, and Charles C. Di Paula and Thomas N. Biddison, Assistant State's Attorneys, for the State.
Unreported cases.