From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oyebola v. Makuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 7, 2004
10 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-08402

September 7, 2004.

Before: Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated July 10, 2003, which, inter alia, denied that branch of her motion which was to vacate an order of the same court dated February 26, 2003, which, upon her default in opposing the motion, granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To warrant vacatur of an order entered on default, a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default in opposing a defendant's motion and a meritorious cause of action ( see Beale v. Yepes, 309 AD2d 886). Here, the plaintiff failed to establish that her claim of serious injury was meritorious.

In light of the forgoing, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contention.


Summaries of

Oyebola v. Makuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 7, 2004
10 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Oyebola v. Makuch

Case Details

Full title:OLAWUNMI OYEBOLA, Appellant, v. ROMAN MAKUCH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 7, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
781 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

St. Rose v. McMorrow

Ordered that the order dated September 8, 2006 is affirmed, with costs. In order to vacate the order entered…

Quintero v. Kim

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion to vacate the order…