From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oxbridge Partners v. New England Video, LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 30, 1995
213 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Summary

referring to "a series of letters, executed proposals, and addenda"

Summary of this case from Sequoia Healthcare Servs., LLC v. Essex Capital Corp.

Opinion

March 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.).


The IAS Court's reliance upon the doctrine of part performance to preclude at this stage of the litigation a Statute of Frauds dismissal of plaintiff's complaint is supported by a series of letters, executed proposals, and addenda that raise an issue of fact with respect to whether or not the time for performance of the written agreement between the parties was extended so as to preserve Oxford's right to "finder's fee" compensation against the Statute of Frauds defense (see, Kalfin v. United States Olympic Comm., 209 A.D.2d 279, 280-281).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Oxbridge Partners v. New England Video, LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 30, 1995
213 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

referring to "a series of letters, executed proposals, and addenda"

Summary of this case from Sequoia Healthcare Servs., LLC v. Essex Capital Corp.
Case details for

Oxbridge Partners v. New England Video, LTD

Case Details

Full title:OXBRIDGE PARTNERS, L.P., Respondent, v. NEW ENGLAND VIDEO, LTD., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 408

Citing Cases

Sequoia Healthcare Servs., LLC v. Essex Capital Corp.

The check here is therefore far less comprehensive than the writings considered in the authorities on which…