From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 17, 1947
60 A.2d 184 (Md. 1947)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 17, October Term, 1947.]

Decided December 17, 1947.

Habeas Corpus — Guilt or Innocence and Sufficiency of Evidence Not Retriable On — Petition for Leave to Appeal — Proof of No Indictment — Assault — Sentence, Discretionary — Executive Redress of Too Severe Sentence.

The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus. p. 738

Assault being a common-law offense and a misdemeanor the sentence is in the discretion of the court, according to the circumstances of the case. p. 738

If the sentence imposed in a criminal case is too severe, redress may be sought through the executive authorities. p. 738

Where application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus alleges sentence without warrant or indictment but there are no docket entries or record to show lack of an indictment, application will be denied on that ground. p. 738

Decided December 17, 1947.

Habeas corpus proceeding by Leslie A. Owens against Warden of the Maryland House of Correction wherein the petition was denied. On application for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before MARBURY, C.J., DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON, and MARKELL, JJ.


This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

This petitioner claims that he was unlawfully sentenced to eighteen months on the charge of common assault in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, without a warrant or indictment. He claims that there was not sufficient evidence to convict him, that his wife testified that he broke her arm while the certificate from the doctor showed that her arm was not broken. Assault being a common-law offense and a misdemeanor the sentence is in the discretion of the court, according to the circumstances of the case. If the sentence was too severe redress may be sought through the executive authorities. Hooper v. Warden, 190 Md. 723, 60 A.2d 183, just decided. There are no docket entries or record to show lack of an indictment to support petitioner's contentions. Rountree v. Warden, 189 Md. 292, 55 A.2d 847. There is no showing of denial of fundamental rights. The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus. Olewiler v. Brady, 185 Md. 341, 344, 44 A.2d 807; Bernard v. Warden, 187 Md. 273, 49 A.2d 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A.2d 553.

Application denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Owens v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 17, 1947
60 A.2d 184 (Md. 1947)
Case details for

Owens v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:OWENS v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 17, 1947

Citations

60 A.2d 184 (Md. 1947)
60 A.2d 184

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Warden

Regarding the contention that the sentence in the attempted escape case was illegal this Court held in Casey…

Steele v. State of Del

Under the common law, where no specific punishment has been provided by statute, the sentence is left to the…