From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Overseas Equipment v. Aceros

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 30, 1979
376 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Summary

In Overseas Equipment Co. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos, 376 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), the court reached the same conclusion when it reversed $50,000 in punitive damages and affirmed $20,000 in compensatory damages.

Summary of this case from N. Am. Van Lines v. Ferguson Transp

Opinion

No. 78-1992.

November 7, 1979. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, George Orr, J.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, Frank Marks, Miami, for appellant.

Grable Diequez, Hialeah, Podhurst, Orseck Parks and Walter H. Beckham, Jr., and Michael Olin, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.


This court, in a prior opinion [see: Overseas Equipment Co., Inc. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos, 374 So.2d 537 (Fla.App. 3d DCA 1979)], reversed a $50,000.00 punitive damages award awarded to the appellee, Aceros Arquitectonicos, and affirmed a $20,000.00 compensatory award. The cause then reoccurred in the trial court by Overseas Equipment filing a motion to tax appellate cost the trial court denied.

In relation to costs, the appellate rules provide:

. . . . .

"Rule 9.400. Costs and Attorney's Fees

(a) Costs. Costs shall be taxed in favor of the prevailing party unless the court orders otherwise. Taxable costs shall include:

(1) fees for filing and service of process;

(2) charges for preparation of the record;

(3) bond premiums; and

(4) other costs permitted by law. Costs shall be taxed by the lower tribunal on motion served within 30 days after issuance of the mandate."

. . . . .

The mandate from this court provided, in part, as follows:

. . . . .

"YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED that such further proceedings be had in said cause in accordance with the opinion of this Court attached hereto and incorporated as part of this order, and with the rules of procedure and laws of the State of Florida."

. . . . .

Overseas Equipment having been the substantially prevailing party in the appellate proceedings, it should have been accorded its appellate costs. Therefore, the order under review be and the same is hereby reversed, with directions to enter a cost judgment in favor of Overseas Equipment Co., Inc., in accordance with its motion.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.


Summaries of

Overseas Equipment v. Aceros

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 30, 1979
376 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

In Overseas Equipment Co. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos, 376 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), the court reached the same conclusion when it reversed $50,000 in punitive damages and affirmed $20,000 in compensatory damages.

Summary of this case from N. Am. Van Lines v. Ferguson Transp
Case details for

Overseas Equipment v. Aceros

Case Details

Full title:OVERSEAS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT, v. ACEROS ARQUITECTONICOS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 30, 1979

Citations

376 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

N. Am. Van Lines v. Ferguson Transp

In reaching this conclusion, we are not taking a strictly numerical approach, but we also cannot totally…

Milio v. Leinoff Silvers

The final order of the trial court denying Vincent Milio's motion for appellate costs following the…