From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oswego Hydro Partners L.P. v. Phoenix Hydro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner was not required to plead or prove, as a prerequisite to the acquisition of property by eminent domain, that it negotiated in good faith with the owner (see, Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. [Neptune Assocs.], 143 A.D.2d 1012, 1014).


Summaries of

Oswego Hydro Partners L.P. v. Phoenix Hydro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Oswego Hydro Partners L.P. v. Phoenix Hydro

Case Details

Full title:OSWEGO HYDRO PARTNERS L.P., Respondent, v. PHOENIX HYDRO CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
558 N.Y.S.2d 362

Citing Cases

Village of Saranac Lake v. Bujold (In re Village of Saranac Lake)

at the appraiser determined that there would be “no measurable change in the value of [respondents']…

In the Matter of New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 2010 NY Slip Op 50301(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 3/1/2010)

"There is no requirement that petitioner plead or prove, as a prerequisite to the acquisition of property by…