From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ostrowski v. Cape Transit Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 17, 2005
182 N.J. 585 (N.J. 2005)

Opinion

A-66 September Term 2004

Argued February 28, 2005

Decided March 17, 2005

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 371 N.J.Super. 499, 853 A.2d 985 (2004).

F. Herbert Owens, III, argued the cause for appellants (Cooper Levenson April Niedelman Wagenheim and Sweeney Sheehan, attorneys; Gerard W. Quinn, on the briefs).

Lars S. Hyberg, argued the cause for respondents (McAllister, Hyberg, White Cohen, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 499, 853 A.2d 985 (2004).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Ostrowski v. Cape Transit Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 17, 2005
182 N.J. 585 (N.J. 2005)
Case details for

Ostrowski v. Cape Transit Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN G. OSTROWSKI AND DOLORES OSTROWSKI, HUSBAND AND WIFE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 17, 2005

Citations

182 N.J. 585 (N.J. 2005)
868 A.2d 321

Citing Cases

Visaggio v. Dorthe

In our view, the probative value of that testimony was substantially outweighed by its prejudicial impact,…

Huffin v. Beam Bros. Trucking, Inc.

See, e.g., Ostrowski v. Cape Transit Corp., 371 N.J. Super. 499, 503 (App. Div. 2004), aff'd o.b., 182 N.J.…