Osborne v. Purdome

Full title: EX PARTE ALFRED H. OSBORNE, PETITIONER, v. J. A. PURDOME, SHERIFF…

Court: Kansas City Court of Appeals, Missouri

Date published: Dec 8, 1952

254 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1952)

Opinion

No. 21814.

December 8, 1952.

Walter Calvin, Kansas City, for petitioner.

Carl E. Enggas, James A. Moore and David M. Proctor, Kansas City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the exact question presented in Ex parte Ponick v. Purdome. Mo.App., 254 S.W.2d 673. Petitioner Osborne is also entitled to his discharge under the writ. It is so ordered. All concur.