From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. State

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Jan 22, 2016
366 P.3d 1084 (Haw. Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

explaining that "Maugaotega does not apply retroactively to Ortiz's collateral attack of his extended term sentences," under HRS § 706-662

Summary of this case from Ortiz v. Taylor

Opinion

No. CAAP–14–0001136.

01-22-2016

Larry J. ORTIZ, Petitioner–Appellant, v. STATE of Hawai‘i, Respondent–Appellee.

Larry J. Ortiz, Petitioner–Appellant, on the briefs, pro se. Brian R. Vincent, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, on the briefs, for Respondent–Appellee.


SUMMARY DISPOSITIONAL ORDER

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. State

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Jan 22, 2016
366 P.3d 1084 (Haw. Ct. App. 2016)

explaining that "Maugaotega does not apply retroactively to Ortiz's collateral attack of his extended term sentences," under HRS § 706-662

Summary of this case from Ortiz v. Taylor
Case details for

Ortiz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry J. ORTIZ, Petitioner–Appellant, v. STATE of Hawai‘i…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Jan 22, 2016

Citations

366 P.3d 1084 (Haw. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. Unidentified

I. BACKGROUND These facts are taken from Ortiz v. State, No. CAAP-14-0001136, 2016 WL 300214, at *1 (Haw.…

Ortiz v. Taylor

Four years later, on or about December 23, 2013, Ortiz filed another pro se Rule 40 Petition ("Second Rule 40…