From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. State

Court of Appeals of Idaho
Jul 1, 1993
856 P.2d 104 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 20070.

July 1, 1993.

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, CANYON COUNTY; GERALD L. WESTON, DISTRICT JUDGE.

Ismael Chavez, Caldwell, for appellant.

Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., Thomas P. Watkins, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Gustavo Ortiz appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We vacate the dismissal order and remand for consideration of Ortiz's request for court-appointed counsel which should have been determined prior to disposing of the post-conviction petition.

When he pled guilty in 1990 to sexual abuse of a child, Ortiz was represented by the public defender's office. He was convicted and sentenced to the custody of the Board of Correction for a term of two to eight years. No direct appeal from his conviction and sentence was taken, and he has been incarcerated since the date of his conviction. In his post-conviction petition, Ortiz enumerated how he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel, and he included a request for court-appointed counsel to assist him in the post-conviction proceeding. Ortiz also filed a separate motion and affidavit of indigency for counsel to be appointed, citing I.C.R. 44 as the basis for his right to counsel.

Idaho Code § 19-4904 provides that a petitioner seeking post-conviction relief is entitled to court-appointed counsel if he has no means to pay for counsel. Here, Ortiz made the required showing of indigency in support of his motion to appoint counsel, although he did not rely on I.C. § 19-4904; but the district court did not rule on his motion.

The district court ordered a conditional dismissal of Ortiz's petition on May 18, 1992, and entered its summary order of dismissal without ever addressing Ortiz's request for a court-appointed attorney. Accordingly, our review of the merits of the dismissal of the post-conviction petition must be forestalled. Henderson v. State, 123 Idaho 138, 844 P.2d 1388 (Ct.App. 1992). We vacate the order of dismissal of the petition for post-conviction relief and remand to the district court for action in accordance with this opinion.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. State

Court of Appeals of Idaho
Jul 1, 1993
856 P.2d 104 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Ortiz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gustavo ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of Idaho

Date published: Jul 1, 1993

Citations

856 P.2d 104 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993)
124 Idaho 67

Citing Cases

Swisher v. State

If, on the other hand, the claims are unquestionably barred by the statute of limitation, as the State urges…

Fox v. State

When presented with a request for appointed counsel, the court must address this request before ruling on the…