From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Scibana

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2006
Case No. CIV-06-834-M (W.D. Okla. Oct. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-06-834-M.

October 31, 2006


ORDER


On September 28, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be summarily dismissed without prejudice to refiling petitioner's claims in a civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by October 18, 2006. A review of the file reveals no objection has been filed.

Upon de novo review, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 28, 2006, and
(2) DISMISSES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice to the refiling of petitioner's claims in a civil rights action pursuant to Bivens.
IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Scibana

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2006
Case No. CIV-06-834-M (W.D. Okla. Oct. 31, 2006)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Scibana

Case Details

Full title:ALVARO ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH SCIBANA, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 31, 2006

Citations

Case No. CIV-06-834-M (W.D. Okla. Oct. 31, 2006)

Citing Cases

White v. Okla. Dep't of Corr.

(“The federal habeas statute gives the United States district courts jurisdiction to entertain petitions for…

McCluskey v. Candelaria

Prisoners who raise constitutional challenges to other prison decisions -- including transfers to…