From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1993
193 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 11, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.).


The court properly determined that the proposed deposition regarding the collateral issue of the copying of decedent's medical record by plaintiff's daughter while an employee of defendant was not relevant, necessary or material to the litigation (see, Stephen-Leedom Carpet Co. v Arkwright-Boston Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co., 101 A.D.2d 574, lv dismissed 64 N.Y.2d 754). Further, as the referring attorney herein had been contacted in his capacity as an attorney, for the purpose of obtaining legal advice and services, the attorney client privilege precluded his testimony (CPLR 3101 [b]; 4503; see, Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 N.Y.2d 62, 68-69).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1993
193 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:AQUILINA ORTIZ, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of FABIAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

Surgical Design Corporation v. Correa

the Referee in camera was protected by the attorney-client privilege ( see CPLR 4503). All but the three…

Radovic v. City of New York

(Kitz v Buckmaster, 45 App. Div. 283, 285, lv denied 47 App. Div. 633 [4th Dept 1900].) The termination of…