From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2013
NO. CV 11-420-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CV 11-420-JAK (AGR)

12-06-2013

MICHAEL R. ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. K. HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

____________________________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2013
NO. CV 11-420-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. K. HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2013

Citations

NO. CV 11-420-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Davis

___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. At 1129-30. Using this reasoning, district courts within the Ninth Circuit have held…

Carpenter v. Davis

Id. at 1128 (internal quotation and citation omitted); see also id. at 1130 (noting discretion enables a…