examining whether those plaintiffs properly rescinded their mortgage transaction, when the property at issue had not been sold or transferred
Summary of this case from Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services Inc.No. 99-687.
January 10, 2000, OCTOBER TERM, 1999.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 181 F. 3d 446.
examining whether those plaintiffs properly rescinded their mortgage transaction, when the property at issue had not been sold or transferred
Summary of this case from Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services Inc.agreeing with McKinney
Summary of this case from Shadie v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.Full title:ORTHOFIX S. R. L. ET AL. v. EBI MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 10, 2000
Thus, they concluded the one year limitation is not a jurisdictional requirement for all diversity cases, but…
Johnson v. AllisonRejecting the district court's earlier imposition of an "intermediate rule" in D.P.M. v. Sensory Mgmt.…