Ortega-Moharo v. Immigration

Full title: Raudel ORTEGA-MOHARO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 11, 1971

441 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 26580.

May 11, 1971.

On Petition for Review of I.N.S.

David C. Marcus (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

James R. Dooley (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., of INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel of INS, San Pedro, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of U.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge.^_

_ The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The order of deportation is affirmed.

Petitioner asserts he was illegally arrested and, therefore, as an alien he can't be deported.

In principle, the case is not unlike the theory of Ramirez et al. v. Lozoya, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 85, cert. denied, 357 U.S. 941, 78 S.Ct. 1391, 2 L.Ed.2d 1554.