recognizing the existence of exceptions for "infancy" and "incapacity" (citing Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp., 82 A.2d 379, 383 (Del. 1951))
Summary of this case from Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. KeeNo. 89, 2004.
September 20, 2004.
Appeal from the Superior Court, New Castle County, CA 04C-01-283.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
recognizing the existence of exceptions for "infancy" and "incapacity" (citing Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp., 82 A.2d 379, 383 (Del. 1951))
Summary of this case from Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. KeeFull title:OROPEZA v. MAURER
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Sep 20, 2004
"Healthtrio, Inc., 2007 WL 544156, at *7 (citing Oropeza v. Maurer, 2004 WL 2154292, at *1 (Del.…
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP v. Oki Data Corp.However, it is unclear when the precise failure in discovery production occurred. Oropeza v. Maurer, 2004 WL…