From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orlando v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 23, 1996
681 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-868.

October 23, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Alan Gold, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Ada Manzano Avallone, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.


We find no merit in the defendant's contentions that certain comments made by the prosecutor vitiated his entire trial and therefore affirm on the basis of § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 960, 111 S.Ct. 2275, 114 L.Ed.2d 726 (1991); Duest v. State, 462 So.2d 446 (Fla. 1985); Irving v. State, 627 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Hightower v. State, 592 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Shaara v. State, 581 So.2d 1339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

However, the state concedes error as to the defendant's sentence for robbery, so we reverse that sentence and remand for resentencing in accord with section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1995).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.


Summaries of

Orlando v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 23, 1996
681 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Orlando v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RAMOS ORLANDO, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 23, 1996

Citations

681 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)