From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Reilly v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 8, 1972
472 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 26892.

December 8, 1972.

J. Richard Thesing (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Joseph E. Mayer, Atty. (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Bernard Dunau (argued), Louis Poulton, Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., Robert Morgan, of Morgan, Beauzay Hammer, San Jose, Cal., for intervenor.

On petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SHARP, District Judge.

The Honorable Morell E. Sharp, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.


This case, heard by this Court in a consolidated hearing with Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board and International Association of Machinists, Oakland Lodge No. 284, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir., 1972), involves the single issue of whether or not the National Labor Relations Board should consider the reasonableness of the amount of fines imposed by a union upon its members for violation of its internal rules. The Board concluded that this was not its function. For the reasons stated in Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board, et al., supra, filed this date, we disagree and therefore reverse and remand to the Board for further proceedings.

Circuit Judge BROWNING would enforce the Board's order for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board, supra.


Summaries of

O'Reilly v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 8, 1972
472 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

O'Reilly v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID O'REILLY, PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 1972

Citations

472 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.

The allegations were basically twofold: first, that the Union committed an unfair labor practice by fining…

Morton Salt Company v. N.L.R.B

Whether by a holding that such a fine was not restraint or coercion within the meaning of Section 8(b)(1)(A),…