From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orea v. D'Auria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 1990
160 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 2, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs, who had contracted to purchase a parcel of land with a home built upon it from the defendants, sought in this action to recover their $18,000 down payment which was retained by the defendants after the plaintiffs failed to appear at three scheduled closings. Where, as here, a buyer has been given adequate opportunity to perform under a contract for the sale and purchase of real property and fails to do so, the seller may hold him in default (see, Shannon v. Simon, 128 A.D.2d 859). Where a purchaser defaults under an agreement to purchase real property, the seller may retain the down payment paid upon the execution of the agreement (Maxton Bldrs. v. Lo Galbo, 113 A.D.2d 923, affd 68 N.Y.2d 373; accord, Levine v. Trattner, 130 A.D.2d 462). As it does not appear that there are any questions of fact to be tried, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Orea v. D'Auria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 1990
160 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Orea v. D'Auria

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO OREA et al., Appellants, v. PETER D'AURIA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Barry Berman Realty Assoc

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly found that the plaintiff defaulted on the contract, entitling the…

Progressive Solar Concepts, Inc. v. Gabes

Upon this record, it can only be concluded that the defendants acted in good faith in their efforts to convey…