Summary
In O'Neal v. Kammin, 263 Ga. 218, 219 (430 S.E.2d 586) (1993), the Supreme Court held that a misdemeanor conviction for possession of marijuana is not a crime of moral turpitude and thus may not be used to impeach a witness.
Summary of this case from Lastinger v. Mill MachineryOpinion
S93G0578.
DECIDED JUNE 21, 1993.
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 206 Ga. App. 855.
Martin, Snow, Grant Napier, Cubbedge Snow III, for appellant.
Dozier, Akin, Lee Graham, L. Zack Dozier, Jr., for appellee.
We granted this petition for certiorari to determine whether a misdemeanor conviction for possession of less than an ounce of marijuana is admissible for impeachment purposes. We hold that it is not and reverse.
O'Neal and Kammin were involved in an automobile accident in November of 1987. In the resulting litigation, the jury rendered a verdict for O'Neal, the defendant, finding that she was not negligent and not responsible for the accident. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment on the verdict, ruling that the trial court erred in not allowing Kammin to introduce for purposes of impeachment O'Neal's misdemeanor conviction for possession of less than an ounce of marijuana since such a conviction involves moral turpitude. Kammin v. O'Neal, 206 Ga. App. 855 ( 426 S.E.2d 633) (1992).
The Court of Appeals reasoned that misdemeanor possession of contraband, regardless of how it was acquired, is a link in the chain of drug trafficking, a crime of infamy. It concluded, in effect, that the convicted witness should be viewed as a party to a greater crime. We do not adopt that conclusion, but look, instead, to the gravity of the conviction itself.
"In Georgia, the rule is that a witness may be impeached by proof of a conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude. [Cits.]" Hall v. Hall, 261 Ga. 188 ( 402 S.E.2d 726) (1991). The use of the term moral turpitude has been "restricted to the gravest offenses, consisting of felonies, infamous crimes, and those that are malum in se and disclose a depraved mind." Lewis v. State, 243 Ga. 443, 444 ( 254 S.E.2d 830) (1979). Under that definition it is apparent that a misdemeanor conviction for possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, a conviction equivalent to a misdemeanor conviction for DUI (see Hall v. Hall, supra), is not a crime of moral turpitude. It does not suggest an "insensibility to the obligation of an oath." Lewis, supra at 446. The decision of the Court of Appeals must, therefore, be reversed.
Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.