From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

One E. 8th St. Corp. v. Third Brevoort Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1971
38 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Summary

In One East 8th St. Corp. v. Third Brevoort Corp., 38 AD2d 524, 326 NYS2d 829 (1st Dep't 1971), the court refused to allow the respondent to be evicted where the violation was removed prior to the issuance of the notice of termination.

Summary of this case from Rockville Ctr. Hous. Auth. v. Boggen

Opinion

December 9, 1971


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 19, 1971, unanimously reversed, on the law, and judgment is granted to plaintiff, declaring One East 8th St. Corp. to have complied with the notice of default and vacating said notice and permanently enjoining termination of the lease by reason of the alleged default. Appellant shall recover of respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The notice of termination of the lease dated August 5, 1971 refers to violation 4220/70 (double doors). This violation was removed of record on May 20, 1971. It had been removed prior to the issuance of the notice of termination. Further, defendant was bound by the notice served and cannot substitute another violation. In any event, even this violation (Z7-71) was removed of record on August 4, 1971.

Concur — Capozzoli, J.P., McGivern, Murphy, Steuer and Eager, JJ.


Summaries of

One E. 8th St. Corp. v. Third Brevoort Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1971
38 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

In One East 8th St. Corp. v. Third Brevoort Corp., 38 AD2d 524, 326 NYS2d 829 (1st Dep't 1971), the court refused to allow the respondent to be evicted where the violation was removed prior to the issuance of the notice of termination.

Summary of this case from Rockville Ctr. Hous. Auth. v. Boggen
Case details for

One E. 8th St. Corp. v. Third Brevoort Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ONE EAST 8TH ST. CORP., Appellant, v. THIRD BREVOORT CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1971

Citations

38 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Singh v. Ramirez

In our view, the notice cannot be parsed as was done by the trial court. It is elementary that the predicate…

Rockville Ctr. Hous. Auth. v. Boggen

However, when no proper termination notice has been given as required by the lease, Petitioner cannot proceed…