From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olson v. American Oil Company

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jul 3, 1979
604 F.2d 26 (8th Cir. 1979)

Summary

In Olson v. American Oil Co., 604 F.2d 26 (8th Cir. 1979), an employee injured on the job in North Dakota chose to file his workers' compensation claim in Minnesota, where he also worked and where his employer also provided coverage, and to bring a tort action against the employer in North Dakota. The court held that the immunity afforded employers under the North Dakota workers' compensation statute was not defeated by the plaintiff-employee's election to pursue benefits in Minnesota.

Summary of this case from Snyder v. Celsius Energy Co.

Opinion

No. 79-1047.

Submitted June 14, 1979.

Decided July 3, 1979.

James L. Lamb, Degnan, McElroy, Lamb, Camrud, Maddock Olson, Grand Forks, N.D., for appellant.

John D. Kelly, Vogel, Brantner, Kelly, Knutson, Weir Bye, Fargo, N.D., for appellee American Oil; Jane C. Heinley, Fargo, N.D., on the brief.

Mitchell Mahoney, Pringle Herigstad, Minot, N.D., for appellee Hanson.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Bruce M. Van Sickle, Judge.

Before HEANEY, ROSS and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.


Orville L. Olson, Jr., appeals from a decision of the District Court granting motions for summary judgment in favor of American Oil Company and Wally Hanson, an employee of American Oil Company. The primary issue on appeal is whether Olson's common law action against American and Hanson is barred in light of the payments American made to Olson pursuant to Minnesota Workmen's Compensation laws.

We have carefully considered the briefs and the record. We affirm on the basis of the District Court's opinion. Orville L. Olson, Jr. v. American Oil Company and Wally Hanson, 474 F. Supp. 560 (D.N.D. 1978).


Summaries of

Olson v. American Oil Company

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jul 3, 1979
604 F.2d 26 (8th Cir. 1979)

In Olson v. American Oil Co., 604 F.2d 26 (8th Cir. 1979), an employee injured on the job in North Dakota chose to file his workers' compensation claim in Minnesota, where he also worked and where his employer also provided coverage, and to bring a tort action against the employer in North Dakota. The court held that the immunity afforded employers under the North Dakota workers' compensation statute was not defeated by the plaintiff-employee's election to pursue benefits in Minnesota.

Summary of this case from Snyder v. Celsius Energy Co.

In Olson v. American Oil Co., 604 F.2d 26 (8th Cir. 1979) affirming 474 F. Supp. 560 (D.N.D. 1978), an oil company provided coverage for all its employees in North Dakota and Minnesota. Because Mr. Olson traveled to parts of North Dakota and Minnesota while performing his duties, he was covered in both of those states.

Summary of this case from Carriere v. C.C. Crane Corp.

In Olson, a court applied a sister state's immunity provision even in the instance when the employee elected to avoid the provision by applying for compensation in another state which the employer was also a contributor.

Summary of this case from Carriere v. C.C. Crane Corp.
Case details for

Olson v. American Oil Company

Case Details

Full title:ORVILLE L. OLSON, JR., APPELLANT, v. AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, A FOREIGN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 3, 1979

Citations

604 F.2d 26 (8th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

Snyder v. Celsius Energy Co.

That the plaintiffs have elected to file workers' compensation claims in New Mexico rather than Colorado is…

Carriere v. C.C. Crane Corp.

An instructive case on this very issue is found in the Eighth Circuit. In Olson v. American Oil Co., 604 F.2d…