From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. Langdorf

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 6, 1916
231 F. 76 (9th Cir. 1916)

Opinion


231 F. 76 (9th Cir. 1916) OLMSTED-STEVENSON CO. v. LANGDORF. In re LANGDORF. No. 2627. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 6, 1916

Petition for Revision of a Certain Order of the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana, in Bankruptcy; George M. Bourquin, Judge.

In the matter of S. A. Langdorf, bankrupt. On petition by the Olmsted-Stevenson Company for revision, under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, Sec. 24b, 30 Stat. 553 (Comp. St. 1913, Sec. 9608), of an order in matter of law. Affirmed.

John B. Clayberg, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

L. P. Forestell, of San Francisco, Cal., and Rodgers & Rodgers, of Anaconda, Mont., for respondent.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, in accordance with the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, filed August 23, 1915, providing that the above-entitled matter shall abide the decision of this court as rendered in the matter of Olmsted-Stevenson Co., a Corporation, Petitioner, v. R. S. Miller, Bankrupt, Respondent, in the Matter of R. S. Miller, a Bankrupt (No. 2628) 231 F. 69, . . . C.C.A. . . ., and in accordance with the decision this day rendered by this court in the latter matter.


Summaries of

Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. Langdorf

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 6, 1916
231 F. 76 (9th Cir. 1916)
Case details for

Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. Langdorf

Case Details

Full title:OLMSTED-STEVENSON CO. v. LANGDORF. [1] In re LANGDORF.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 1916

Citations

231 F. 76 (9th Cir. 1916)

Citing Cases

First Nat. Bk. of Hartsville v. Wood et al

Messrs. Miller Lawson, for respondent, cite: As toalteration of written instruments: 2 C.J. 1223; 35 S.C. Eq.…