From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 3, 1999
727 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

holding that a rule 3.800 motion cannot serve as a substitute for the state filing a proper appeal of a sentence imposed in error

Summary of this case from Linnon v. State

Opinion

No. 97-2422

Opinion filed February 3, 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Sheldon M. Schapiro, Judge; L.T. No. 93-5600CF10A.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Debra Rescigno, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, Terry L. Oliver, appeals the trial court's sentencing order of April 15, 1997. This is Oliver's second appeal in this matter. The first appeal resulted in a remand for resentencing. See Oliver v. State, 687 So.2d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Upon remand, Oliver received a guidelines sentence of twelve years. Oliver appeals, contending that should receive the original downward departure sentence of two years community control followed by five years probation as recommended by the Department of Corrections. The state asserts that Oliver was properly sentenced on remand, and that the original downward departure sentence was improper.

The state must seek correction of an improper downward departure sentence through an appeal. See Oliver; see also Gartrell v. State, 626 So.2d 1364, 1365 (Fla. 1993). Since the state did not timely appeal Oliver's downward departure sentence of August 18, 1995, and since its verbal 3.800 (a) motion to correct the sentence cannot serve as a substitute for a notice of appeal, we must reverse under Gartrell. See id.

We therefore reverse and remand for reinstatement of the original sentence of two years community control followed by five years probation, special condition ninety days jail for Counts I and II, and direct that as to Counts III and IV, Oliver shall receive credit time served as originally ordered.

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN, GROSS, JJ., and BAILEY, JENNIFER D., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Oliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 3, 1999
727 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

holding that a rule 3.800 motion cannot serve as a substitute for the state filing a proper appeal of a sentence imposed in error

Summary of this case from Linnon v. State

holding that a rule 3.800 motion cannot serve as a substitute for the state filing a proper appeal of a sentence imposed in error

Summary of this case from Delemos v. State
Case details for

Oliver v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY L. OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 3, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Linnon v. State

Under those circumstances, the State is compelled to object and appeal the sentence or the sentence stands as…

Delemos v. State

Under those circumstances, the State is compelled to object and appeal the sentence or the sentence stands as…