From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. KFC Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
CASE NO. 06CV2273 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 06CV2273 JLS (BLM).

January 25, 2008


ORDER (1) GRANTING RULE 56(f) CONTINUANCE OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. Nos. 26, 45)


Presently before the Court is the declaration of Lynn Hubbard, III, counsel for A.J. Oliver ("plaintiff"). Defendant KFC Corporation previously filed a motion for summary judgment on September 24, 2007. (Doc. No. 26.) Plaintiff filed his cross-motion on October 1, 2007. (Doc. No. 35.) The case was then reassigned from the Hon. John A. Houston to the Hon. Janis L. Sammartino on October 5, 2007, and the hearing date on the motion was subsequently reset. On January 4, 2008, defendant KFC Corporation ("KFC") filed, without warning, a much larger "amended motion" for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 41.) The amended motion includes factual allegations that KFC re-modeled its restaurant and legal arguments that plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act claim now fails for mootness. Plaintiff seeks relief under Rule 56(f) to allow additional time for his expert to return to KFC's restaurant to conduct an inspection of the remodeled restaurant. KFC and co-defendant Purcell Webb have filed oppositions to the request. (Doc. Nos. 46-47.)

Having reviewed the declaration of plaintiff's counsel and defendants' oppositions, the Court hereby ORDERS the following:

— KFC's original motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 26) is denied as moot. KFC's amended motion is now the operative motion.

— The Court grants plaintiff's request and orders plaintiff's expert to conduct a site inspection of KFC's restaurant within four (4) weeks of the date this Order is docketed.

— Plaintiff shall file his opposition to KFC's amended motion no later than Friday, March 7, 2008.

— KFC shall file its reply in support of its amended motion no later than Friday, March 14, 2008.

— The Court hereby vacates the hearing on the cross-motions previously set for Friday, February 8, 2008. When the Court has received KFC's reply, the Court shall set a new hearing date at that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oliver v. KFC Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
CASE NO. 06CV2273 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Oliver v. KFC Corporation

Case Details

Full title:A. J. OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. KFC CORPORATION d/b/a KFC #Y450025; PURCELL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 06CV2273 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Strong v. Foods

mony because plaintiff failed to timely designate himself as an expert); Lee v. City of Novato, 2004 U.S.…

Castaneda v. Burger King Corp.

Here, the complaint's second count asserts precisely such a claim, i.e., a violation of Unruh by reason of a…