From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 12, 1979
376 So. 2d 1256 (La. 1979)

Opinion

No. 64615.

November 12, 1979.

Wayne H. Carlton, Jr., Orlando G. Bendana, Law Office of Bendana Carlton, New Orleans, for plaintiff-applicant.

Robert E. Leake, Jr., Frank H. Walk, Jr., Hammett, Leake, Hammett, Hulse Nelson, New Orleans, John J. Hainkel, Jr., Porteous, Toledano, Hainkel Johnson, New Orleans, for defendants-respondents.


Having made a thorough examination of the case, we have concluded that the opinion of the court of appeal, reaches the correct result. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the intermediate court.

AFFIRMED.

SUMMERS, C. J., dissents.

CALOGERO, J., concurs in part, dissents in part and assigns reasons.


I agree with the result in the courts below denying plaintiff recovery against plaintiff's uninsured motorist carrier, Government Employees' Insurance Company. However, I dissent from that part of the judgment denying plaintiff recovery against Frank Jones and his liability insurer, Allstate Insurance Company. In my opinion the trial court judgment exonerating Jones was clearly wrong. A motorist who strikes another in the latter's traffic lane is "strictly accountable" and must exculpate himself from "any dereliction, however slight." Rizley v. Cutrer, 232 La. 655, 95 So.2d 139 (1957); Simon v. Ford Motor Co., 282 So.2d 126 (La. 1973). Rather than exonerating Jones the evidence at least equally supports negligence on his part.


Summaries of

Oliver v. Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 12, 1979
376 So. 2d 1256 (La. 1979)
Case details for

Oliver v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JAMES OLIVER v. FRANK JONES ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Nov 12, 1979

Citations

376 So. 2d 1256 (La. 1979)

Citing Cases

Lemieux v. Prudential Ins. Co.

It has been consistently held by the courts of this state that, in order to recover against his UM insurer,…

Harrison v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.

It is well-settled that the requirement that there be physical contact between the unidentified hit and run…