From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliva v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 28, 1998
991 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 651-97.

October 28, 1998

Appeal from the 338th District Court, Harris County; Mary Bacon, Judge.

Ira Perz, Houston, for appellant.

Julie Klibert, Assistant District Attorney, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Prosecuting Attorney, Austin, for State.


OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault and assessed his punishment at confinement for fifty years. On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for a new punishment hearing based on its determination appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel at the punishment phase of his trial. Oliva v. State, 942 S.W.2d 727, No. 14-94-00972-CR (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.], March 20, 1997) (not yet reported).

We granted discretionary review to determine, among other things, whether the Duffy standard should continue to apply to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at the punishment phase of a noncapital sentencing proceeding. See Ex parte Duffy, 607 S.W.2d 507 (Tex.Cr.App. 1980). The Court has decided to dismiss the State's petition for discretionary review as improvidently granted.

WOMACK, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Oliva v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 28, 1998
991 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)
Case details for

Oliva v. State

Case Details

Full title:Isidoro Ramirez OLIVA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Oct 28, 1998

Citations

991 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Thacker v. State

In any event, Thacker contends counsel's failure to preserve the alleged Bruton violation deprived her of her…

Peña-Mota v. State

However, the Court has dismissed two of these petitions as improvidently granted. See Raney v. State, 982…