rejecting a due-process claim based on a lost opportunity to earn good-time credits because this possibility rested on speculation
Summary of this case from United States v. Nixon98-3179.
February 19, 1999.
Appeal from D.Kan., 4 F.Supp.2d 1268.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
rejecting a due-process claim based on a lost opportunity to earn good-time credits because this possibility rested on speculation
Summary of this case from United States v. Nixonapplying Rucks standard to deny a motion for reconsideration of the denial of a request for court-appointed appellate counsel
Summary of this case from Vreeland v. Coffmandefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week, or an equivalent work schedule"
Summary of this case from Bramel v. Colvindefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week"
Summary of this case from Murnane v. Colvindefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week, or an equivalent work schedule"
Summary of this case from Byrd v. Colvindefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week, or an equivalent work schedule"
Summary of this case from Underwood v. Colvindefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week, or an equivalent work schedule"
Summary of this case from Swafford v. Astruedefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week, or an equivalent work schedule"
Summary of this case from Walls v. Astruedefining a "regular and continuing basis" as "8 hours a day, for 5 days a week"
Summary of this case from Waters v. AstrueIn United States v. Johnson, 172 F.3d 879 (Table), 1999 WL 143933, at *1 (10th Cir.Mar. 17, 1999) the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reached a similar conclusion on a case involving similar facts as those in Bollman and those before this Court.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. GuffeyFull title:Olde Discount Corp. v. Hubbard
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Feb 19, 1999
Consequently, Mr. McKenzie does not present a valid due process claim of entitlement based on completion of…
Ellis v. TerrellMr. Ellis challenges the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) determination that he is ineligible for a sentence reduction…