From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ohio v. Smith

U.S.
Oct 4, 2010
562 U.S. 947 (2010)

Summary

denying certiorari review of case where the Ohio Supreme Court held that the warrantless search of a cell phone seized from the defendant's person incident to arrest violated the Fourth Amendment

Summary of this case from Smallwood v. State

Opinion

No. 09–1377.

10-04-2010

OHIO, petitioner, v. Antwaun SMITH.


Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.


Summaries of

Ohio v. Smith

U.S.
Oct 4, 2010
562 U.S. 947 (2010)

denying certiorari review of case where the Ohio Supreme Court held that the warrantless search of a cell phone seized from the defendant's person incident to arrest violated the Fourth Amendment

Summary of this case from Smallwood v. State

arguing that cell phones were not closed containers because they did not store physical objects

Summary of this case from State v. Parris
Case details for

Ohio v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:OHIO v. ANTWAUN SMITH

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 2010

Citations

562 U.S. 947 (2010)
131 S. Ct. 102
178 L. Ed. 2d 242

Citing Cases

Smallwood v. State

Despite this gap in precedent, the Supreme Court has nonetheless denied certiorari review in cases that have…

United States v. Clark

l phone); United States v. DiMarco, No. 12 CR 205 RPP, 2013 WL 444764, at *12 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2013)…