From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oft v. Sims

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 14, 1977
142 Ga. App. 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53593.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 28, 1977.

DECIDED APRIL 14, 1977.

Workmen's compensation. Catoosa Superior Court. Before Judge Painter.

Brown, Harriss, Hartman Ruskaup, Don L. Hartman, for appellant.

Gary Sims, pro se.


Claimant employed to feed and milk cows was injured while lifting bags of feed. The raw milk obtained from the dairy operation was marketed to a large milk processing company. The board of workmen's compensation found claimant to be a "farm laborer" and denied the claim as our Workmen's Compensation Act does not apply to "farm laborers." Held:

Code § 114-107. The term "farm laborers" must be given its ordinary signification, and it signifies the cultivation of agricultural crops. Pridgen v. Murphy, 44 Ga. App. 147 ( 160 S.E. 701). Dairying is defined by Webster as a branch or department of agriculture concerned with the production of milk. Claimant was a farm laborer and his claim was correctly denied.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 28, 1977 — DECIDED APRIL 14, 1977.


Summaries of

Oft v. Sims

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 14, 1977
142 Ga. App. 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Oft v. Sims

Case Details

Full title:OFT v. SIMS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 14, 1977

Citations

142 Ga. App. 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
235 S.E.2d 41

Citing Cases

Lumber City Egg Marketers, Inc. v. Piercy

"The term `farm laborers' must be given its ordinary signification, and it signifies the cultivation of…

J C Poultry v. Reyes-Guzman

See Larson, Law of Workmen's Compensation, 1C § 53.30. The term "farm laborers," as used in OCGA § 34-9-2…