Summary
concluding that an attorney’s factual omissions in an appellate brief violated RPC 3.3
Summary of this case from Dunlap v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of Supreme CourtOpinion
SCAD-11-0000162
02-29-2012
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. EARLE A. PARTINGTON, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(ODC 10-079-8913)
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.,
and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,
in place of Acoba, J., recused)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), that Respondent Partington is reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 29, 2012.
Mark E. Recktenwald
Paula A. Nakayama
James E. Duffy, Jr.
Sabrina S. McKenna
Craig H. Nakamura