From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disc. Counsel v. Feingold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2006
896 A.2d 1161 (Pa. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1093 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

March 3, 2006.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 18, 2005, the Petition for Review, Exceptions and Objections and Petition for Remand, with request for oral argument, and response thereto, the request for oral argument is denied pursuant to Rule 208(e)(4), Pa.R.D.E., and it is hereby

ORDERED that Allen L. Feingold be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Justice CASTILLE dissents and would issue a Rule to Show Cause why respondent should not be disbarred.


Summaries of

Office of Disc. Counsel v. Feingold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2006
896 A.2d 1161 (Pa. 2006)
Case details for

Office of Disc. Counsel v. Feingold

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Allen L. FEINGOLD, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 3, 2006

Citations

896 A.2d 1161 (Pa. 2006)
896 A.2d 1161

Citing Cases

Feingold v. Unitrin Direct

Absent from Feingold's complaint is any mention of his disciplinary history. Feingold was suspended from the…

Feingold v. Hendrzak

In fact, Appellant's March 2006 suspension was based in part on other frivolous actions against opposing…