From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oelsner v. Charles C. Meek Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 20, 1976
555 P.2d 217 (Nev. 1976)

Opinion

No. 8503

October 20, 1976

Appeal from the Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Frank B. Gregory, J.

Goldwater, Fahrenkopf, Mortimer, Sourwine, Mousel Pinkerton, Reno, for Appellants.

Robert A. Grayson, Carson City, for Respondent.


OPINION


An order granting appellants' motion for summary judgment was entered March 14, 1975. The order, inter alia, awarded appellants an attorney's fee in the amount of $2000. Notice of entry of the order was served on respondent's counsel, by mail, the same day. NRAP 4(a); NRAP 26(a).

On April 4, 1975, respondent filed a motion pursuant to NRCP 59 ". . . for an order amending and altering the judgment herein regarding attorney's fees . . ." On September 19, 1975, the trial court granted the motion and entered an order reducing the fee award to $1000. This appeal contends the September 19, 1975 order is void. We agree.

A "motion to amend" filed under NRCP 59 ". . . shall be served not later than 10 days after service of written notice of entry of the judgment." NRCP 59(e). Here, the "motion to amend" was not filed within the required 10 day period; therefore, the district court was without jurisdiction to consider it. Cf. Culinary Workers v. Haugen, 76 Nev. 424, 357 P.2d 113 (1960). Accordingly, the September 19, 1975 order, being null and void, is vacated.


Summaries of

Oelsner v. Charles C. Meek Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 20, 1976
555 P.2d 217 (Nev. 1976)
Case details for

Oelsner v. Charles C. Meek Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL F. OELSNER AND ELAINE E. OELSNER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Oct 20, 1976

Citations

555 P.2d 217 (Nev. 1976)
555 P.2d 217

Citing Cases

Stapp v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Hilton filed its motion on January 9, 1991, nineteen days after the Caudills served notice of entry of…

Ross v. Giacomo

NRCP 50(b). Untimely motions for new trial or judgment n.o.v. must be denied. Hunter v. Sutton, 45 Nev. 427,…