From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odham v. Petersen

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 3, 1983
428 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1983)

Opinion

No. 60822.

March 3, 1983.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — Case No. 80-439.

C. Allen Watts, DeLand, for petitioners.

Daniel D. Eckert, Asst. County Atty., DeLand, for respondents.


We granted review of the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, in Odham v. Petersen, 398 So.2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), because of direct and express conflict with Phipps v. Board of Adjustment, 388 So.2d 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The Fifth District's decision also conflicts with our recent decision in City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1982), wherein we held that where full review of administrative action is given in the circuit court as a matter of right, one appealing the circuit court's judgment is not entitled to a second full review in the district court, but rather may seek review by petition for writ of certiorari.

We disapprove only that portion of the Fifth District Court's decision which conflicts with Vaillant. The other points raised by petitioners are insufficient to warrant a quashing of the district court's decision.

Accordingly, we approve the result reached by the Fifth District's decision.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Odham v. Petersen

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 3, 1983
428 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1983)
Case details for

Odham v. Petersen

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE S. ODHAM, TOM B. STEWART, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 3, 1983

Citations

428 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1983)