From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connor v. Katonah Museum of Art

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, as the record demonstrates that the condition over which the injured plaintiff tripped and fell was not an inherently dangerous condition, and was one which was readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses (see, Binensztok v. Marshall Stores, 228 A.D.2d 534, 535; Pepic v. Joco Realty, 216 A.D.2d 95).

O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Connor v. Katonah Museum of Art

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

O'Connor v. Katonah Museum of Art

Case Details

Full title:ANNE O'CONNOR et al., Appellants, v. KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 183

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Price-Mart Inc.

The record establishes that the bin did not present an inherently dangerous condition. Furthermore, since the…

Plessias v. John Vincent Scalia Home

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. A concrete parking lot divider which is clearly visible…