From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ockerman v. Wise

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 16, 1953
202 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1953)

Opinion

No. 11664.

February 16, 1953.

Kiss Kiss, Cleveland, Ohio, Wm. B. Martin, Lexington, Ky., for appellant.

Woodward, Hobson Fulton, Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


This cause has been heard and considered on the record, on the briefs of the contending parties, and on the oral arguments of attorneys representing the parties;

And it appearing, without dispute, that the appellant administrator and the appellee (defendant) are citizens and residents of the State of Kentucky and were such at the time of the institution of this action and that, therefore, there was no diversity of citizenship to vest jurisdiction in the district court, see Mecom, Adm'r, v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Company, 284 U.S. 183, 52 S.Ct. 84, 76 L.Ed. 233; and Mason v. Helms, D.C.E.D.S.C., 97 F. Supp. 312;

The Judgment of the district court, sustaining appellee's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Ockerman v. Wise

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 16, 1953
202 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1953)
Case details for

Ockerman v. Wise

Case Details

Full title:OCKERMAN v. WISE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 1953

Citations

202 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1953)

Citing Cases

Seymour v. Johnson

And it appearing that under the Kentucky law the filing of the complaint by the alleged foreign executors did…

Remington v. General Motors Corp.

This action must be dismissed for the simple reason that there is no diversity of citizenship between…