From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ochner v. Lancaster Cnty. Dist. Attorney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 1, 2013
65 A.3d 415 (Pa. 2013)

Summary

In Lancaster County v. Lancaster City, 160 Pa. 411, 28 P. 854, the word "county" which is the one hundred and eighteenth word in section 3 of the act of April 13, 1854 (P. L. 352), to be a clerical mistake for the word "city," apparent on the face of the act.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. v. Hooker, County Judge

Opinion

NO. 840 MAL (2012)

2013-05-01

David Ochner v. Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster City Police


Pa.Super., 60 A.3d 860

Appeal from the Superior Court.

Disposition: Denied.


Summaries of

Ochner v. Lancaster Cnty. Dist. Attorney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 1, 2013
65 A.3d 415 (Pa. 2013)

In Lancaster County v. Lancaster City, 160 Pa. 411, 28 P. 854, the word "county" which is the one hundred and eighteenth word in section 3 of the act of April 13, 1854 (P. L. 352), to be a clerical mistake for the word "city," apparent on the face of the act.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. v. Hooker, County Judge
Case details for

Ochner v. Lancaster Cnty. Dist. Attorney

Case Details

Full title:David Ochner v. Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster City Police

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

65 A.3d 415 (Pa. 2013)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. v. Hooker, County Judge

In White v. Rio Grande, W. R. Co., 25 Utah, 346, 71 P. 593, in section 5, art. 8, of the Constitution of that…

Schlosberg et Ux. v. New Castle

The judgment was entered in an adversary proceeding, and, as the term had expired before the execution was…