Obodai v. Indeed, Inc.

Full title: AUSTIN OBODAI (d/b/a Heptad), Plaintiff, v. INDEED, INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Case No.: CV 13-80027-EMC (KAW) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: CV 13-80027-EMC (KAW)

03-12-2013

AUSTIN OBODAI (d/b/a Heptad), Plaintiff, v. INDEED, INC., Defendant.

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' REQUESTS

TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT

MARCH 21, 2013 MOTION HEARING

On March 5, 2013, Plaintiff Austin Obodai submitted a request to appear telephonically at the March 21, 2013 hearing on his motion to quash Defendant Indeed, Inc.'s subpoena on Google, Inc. On March 7, 2013, Defendant submitted a letter also requesting to appear telephonically. (See Dkt. No. 8.)

The Court GRANTS both parties' requests to appear telephonically at the March 21, 2013 motion hearing. The parties are ordered to comply with the Court's Standing Order on Procedures for Telephonic Appearances, available online at http://cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders. This includes personally arranging the telephonic appearance with CourtCall—a paid, private service—in advance of the hearing date.

The parties are advised that, in the future, proposed orders must be submitted with all moving papers, including requests to appear by telephone. See Civil L.R. 7-2(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge