Summary
In Oak Laminates, the imported merchandise consisted of two types of copper clad laminates: "(1) FR4, comprised of eight plies of woven fiberglass fabric impregnated by epoxy resin, and (2) Oak 910, comprised of three plies of non-woven fiberglass fabric, and impregnated by epoxy resin."
Summary of this case from Oak Laminates Div. of Oak Materials Group v. U.S., (1984)Opinion
Appeal No. 85-1873.
February 11, 1986.
David O. Elliott, Barnes, Richardson and Colburn, New York City, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Richard Haroian.
Veronica A. Perry, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office.
Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade; Re, Chief Judge.
Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group (Oak Laminates) appeals from the decision in Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group v. United States, 628 F. Supp. 1577 (1984), reh'g denied, 601 F. Supp. 1031 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984), in which Chief Judge Re of the United States Court of International Trade held that Oak Laminates had not overcome the presumption of correctness that attached to the Customs Service's classification of the merchandise imported by Oak Laminates. We affirm on the basis of these decisions.
AFFIRMED