holding Rule 32 not violated when defense counsel indicated that he had reviewed the PSR with the defendant
Summary of this case from Cavounis v. United StatesNo. 98-7058.
December 9, 1998.
S.D.N.Y.
Affirmed
holding Rule 32 not violated when defense counsel indicated that he had reviewed the PSR with the defendant
Summary of this case from Cavounis v. United Statesholding that forfeiture of accounts constituted "fine or similar penalty" under 162(f)
Summary of this case from Woods v. U.S.requiring defendant to submit "credible reasons" to reject his plea statements
Summary of this case from Valdez v. Stewartrelying on testimony regarding what was objectively expressed between the parties during negotiations
Summary of this case from Bd. of Trs. of MEBA Pension Tr. v. CG Ry., LLC (In re Int'l Shipholding Corp.)relying on testimony regarding what was objectively expressed between the parties during negotiations
Summary of this case from In re Gawker Media LLCFull title:Nycal Corp. v. Inoco PLC
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Dec 9, 1998
"In the final analysis, petitioner[s] had no realistic choice." Murillo v. Commissioner * * * [ T.C. Memo.…
Thompson v. United StatesPlaintiffs contend the IRS "intended to file a potentially ruinous Notice of Federal Tax Lien at an early…