Submitted March 26, 1990
Decided May 8, 1990
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Full title:PAUL DI NUZZO et al., Appellants, v. RONALD GARDNER, Doing Business as…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 8, 1990
Where, as here, “a statute creates a right unknown at common law, and also establishes a time period within…
Kelly v. Cnty. of DutchessAdditionally, the determination finding the petitioner guilty of a portion of specification 6 of supplemental…