From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nudelman v. Stern

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 19, 1942
315 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,640. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 19, 1942

GARNISHMENT, § 113necessity of notice to adverse claimants to appear and defend. Where the answer of a garnishee disclosed that the judgment debtor's bank account was joint with his wife, it was reversible error to proceed to trial without notice to her as required by the Garnishment Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, ch. 62, par. 11; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 109.294).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. MASON S. SULLIVAN, presiding.

Judgment order reversed and cause remanded with directions. Heard in second division, first district, this court at February terra, 1941.

Urion, Bishop Sladkey and James H. Nudelman, for appellant;

Jerome J. Sladkey and James H. Nudelman, of counsel;

Petit, Olin Overmyer, for appellee National Bank of Hyde Park;

Adelor J. Petit and Conrad D. Philos, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 19, 1942.


Summaries of

Nudelman v. Stern

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 19, 1942
315 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Nudelman v. Stern

Case Details

Full title:Nicholas Nudelman, Appellant, v. Harry Stern, Appellee. National Bank of…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 19, 1942

Citations

315 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
42 N.E.2d 853

Citing Cases

Leaf v. McGowan

As to Jasourowski's first contention, the law in this state setting forth the rights of a judgment creditor…

In re Marriage of Souleles

• 5 Petitioner is an adverse claimant, entitled to notice, by virtue of the fact that the savings account was…