From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nowak v. Orange

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 10, 1944
36 A.2d 781 (Pa. 1944)

Opinion

March 28, 1944.

April 10, 1944.

Evidence — Assault and battery — Record of conviction in criminal court on same charge.

In a civil action to recover damages for assault and battery, the record of defendant's conviction in a criminal court on the same charge of assault and battery against the prosecutor is not admissible.

Argued March 28, 1944.

Before MAXEY, C. J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and HUGHES, JJ.

Appeal, No. 24, March T., 1944, from judgment of C. P., Westmoreland Co., Nov. T., 1941, No. 331, in case of Pete Nowak v. Metro N. Orange. Judgment reversed.

Trespass for assault and battery. Before KEENAN, P. J.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff in sum of $3,500. Defendant appealed.

A. C. Scales, of Scales, Loughran Shaw, for appellant.

Vincent R. Smith, for appellee.


This was an action in trespass based upon an alleged assault and battery. After trial the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,500. The defendant moved for a new trial. This was refused; hence this appeal. Several of the assignments of error are based upon the admission in evidence, over defendant's objection, of the Quarter Sessions' record of this same defendant's indictment for aggravated assault and battery against this prosecutor and his conviction under that indictment, the criminal prosecution arising from the same facts as this civil action. The record of the defendant's indictment and conviction of the charge of mayhem against this prosecutor was also admitted over defendant's objection. Testimony of Commonwealth witnesses at the above criminal trials was also admitted over defendant's objection. This entire record is replete with these and similar errors.

It is settled that in a civil action to recover damages from an assault and battery the record of the defendant's conviction in a criminal court of the same charge of assault and battery against the prosecutor is not admissible. See Porter v. Seiler, 23 Pa. 424, 62 Am. Dec. 431 and 4 Am. Juris., sec. 156, p. 199.

The judgment is reversed, with a venire.


Summaries of

Nowak v. Orange

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 10, 1944
36 A.2d 781 (Pa. 1944)
Case details for

Nowak v. Orange

Case Details

Full title:Nowak v. Orange, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 10, 1944

Citations

36 A.2d 781 (Pa. 1944)
36 A.2d 781

Citing Cases

Zubrod v. Kuhn

It should be noted that no particular criminal offense was named in the offer, and to that extent the offer…

Trust Co. v. Pollard

the absence of a statutory provision to the contrary, evidence of a conviction and of a judgment therein, or…