Opinion
A01A0515.
DECIDED: MAY 7, 2001
Burglary. Cherokee Superior Court. Before Judge Mills.
William E. Whitaker, for appellant.
Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Scott T. Poole, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Indicted as a recidivist in the Superior Court of Cherokee County, Alvin Norwood, also known as Rogers Hamilton, was charged with a single count of burglary. On March 20, 2000, with the assistance of counsel, Norwood entered a non-negotiated guilty plea "to all counts of the indictment" and was sentenced to serve 20 years without parole. On appeal, he enumerates the denial of his motion in autrefois convict and the imposition of the twenty-year sentence. We affirm his conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
1. Norwood filed a pre-trial motion to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that he had already pleaded guilty in Cobb County to a charge of burglary allegedly involving the same conduct and same property for which he was charged in Cherokee County.
The special presentment in this case alleged Norwood entered the dwelling of Linda Tabor in Woodstock, Georgia, without permission and with the intent to commit a theft therein. The Cobb County indictment alleged that Norwood burglarized two dwellings on George Busbee Parkway in Cobb County. Norwood pleaded guilty in Cobb Superior Court to one count of burglary and a reduced count of theft by receiving. The factual basis for that plea was that residents of an apartment complex in the Cobb County portion of Busbee Parkway reported two males carrying furniture and belongings out of one of the apartments and loading them into a U-Haul truck. Within moments, police spotted a U-Haul truck and when the patrol activated their blue lights, a high speed chase ensued. The driver and passenger tried to flee the truck but were apprehended. Stolen items were located in the back of the truck.
The Cherokee Superior Court found as fact that Cobb County police recovered property from all three burglaries when they searched the U-Haul. Nevertheless, the transcript of the Cobb County plea hearing makes no mention of Linda Tabor or the burglary of her Woodstock residence, nor does it demonstrate that any of her property was included in the stolen items for which Norwood pleaded guilty to theft by receiving.
In its notice of intent to present similar transactions, the State asserted that the Cherokee burglary was committed only hours before the Cobb burglaries, and that the property stolen in the Cherokee burglary was recovered from the U-Haul.
Where the record shows the accused committed two entirely separate criminal transactions in different counties, though part of a single criminal episode, a guilty plea in one does not bar prosecution for the other by reason of Double Jeopardy or otherwise authorize a plea of autrefois convict. Here, the Cobb Superior Court's acceptance of Norwood's guilty plea to the reduced offense of theft by receiving (arising out of an alleged burglary on George Busbee Parkway in Cobb County) does not amount to a binding determination that someone other than Norwood committed the entirely separate burglary in Woodstock, Cherokee County. The Cherokee Superior Court correctly denied Norwood's motion to dismiss based on his plea of autrefois convict.
Potts v. State, 261 Ga. 716, 720 (1) (b) ( 410 S.E.2d 89) (1991).
Cooper v. State, 253 Ga. 736, 737 (2) ( 325 S.E.2d 137) (1985). Compare Clark v. State, 144 Ga. App. 69, 70 ( 240 S.E.2d 270) (1977) (where defendant pleaded guilty in Gwinnett County to theft by receiving a stolen check-writing machine, that amounted to a binding determination that some other party actually stole the machine and estopped the State from prosecuting Clark in Fulton County for the burglary in which the machine was stolen).
See Maxey v. State, 239 Ga. App. 638, 640 (2) ( 521 S.E.2d 673) (1999).
2. Norwood next contends the trial court erred in concluding that, under O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 (a), a 20-year sentence was mandatory. We agree.
"O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 provide[s] for enhanced sentencing of repeat offenders where no other sentencing provision control[s]." O.C.G.A. § 16-7-1 (b) provides:
Mikell v. State, 270 Ga. 467, 468 ( 510 S.E.2d 523) (1999) (citations omitted).
Upon a second conviction for a crime of burglary occurring after the first conviction, a person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two nor more than 20 years. Upon a third conviction for the crime of burglary occurring after the first conviction, a person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years. Adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence shall not be suspended, probated, deferred, or withheld for any offense punishable under this subsection.
(Emphasis supplied.)
In this case, OCGA § 16-[7-1(b)] provides a specific sentencing scheme for defendants convicted more than once of [burglary] under OCGA § 16-[7-1 (a)]. For this reason, the general recidivist scheme of O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 will [not] apply to multiple [or repeat] convictions under OCGA § 16-[7-1(a) because O.C.G.A. § 16-7-1 (b) does not contemplate or permit] the applicability of O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7.
Mann v. State, Ga. (1) (Case Number S00G0478, decided January 22, 2001).
Since specific sentencing provisions prevail over the general recidivist statute at O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7, we hold the trial court retained the discretion to impose any sentence within the mandatory minimum and the statutory maximum range, and is not bound by the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-7-1 (b), for a second burglary as alleged here, that range is imprisonment for not less than two nor more than 20 years. The trial court erred in imposing a mandatory 20-year sentence. Accordingly, we vacate that sentence and remanded for resentencing in the exercise of the court's enlightened discretion.
Id.
Mann v. State, 240 Ga. App. 809, 810 (1) (a) ( 524 S.E.2d 763) (1999), aff'd, Mann v. State, supra, Ga. at (1).
Mikell v. State, supra, 270 Ga. at 469.
Moton v. State, 242 Ga. App. 397, 400 (3) (b) ( 530 S.E.2d 31) (2000). Accord Mikell v. State, supra, 270 Ga. at 468-469.
3. Remaining contentions have been considered and are found to be without merit.
Judgment of conviction affirmed. Sentence vacated and case remanded for resentencing. Andrews, P.J., and Eldridge, J., concur.